New 42-day free trial Get it now
Smarty

Testing in Go by example: Part 4

Smarty header pin graphic
Updated October 29, 2025
Tags
Smarty header pin graphic

I think it's time for a slight detour. In part 1 we covered the basics of testing in go. In part 2 we covered a few slick ways to execute tests. In part 3 we covered some of our recent endeavors at Smarty to build on the basics. Toward the end of that post, we went into some detail regarding our approach to assertions. The assertions referenced in the GoConvey project are actually their own separate project that are imported into GoConvey. The nice thing about separating the assertions into their own separate project is that they can be used, well, separately. In this post, I'll show you some of the different ways we use the assertions project in our code outside of the GoConvey project.

In GoConvey, the So function exported by the convey package is void. All results of calling So() are swallowed by the convey functionality and passed to the reporting mechanisms. The assertions package (in the assertions project) exports its own version of the So() function, but it returns 2 parameters:

func So(actual interface{}, assert assertion, expected ...interface{}) (bool, string)

Here's the GoDoc comment:

So is a convenience function (as opposed to an inconvenience function?) for running assertions on arbitrary arguments in any context, be it for testing or even application logging. It allows you to perform assertion-like behavior (and get nicely formatted messages detailing discrepancies) but without the program blowing up or panicking. All that is required is to import this package and call So with one of the assertions exported by this package as the second parameter. The first return parameter is a boolean indicating if the assertion was true. The second return parameter is the well-formatted message showing why an assertion was incorrect, or blank if the assertion was correct.

You probably noticed the unexported type assertion in the So() signature above. Here's what it looks like:

// assertion is an alias for a function with a signature that the So()
// function can handle. Any future or custom assertions should conform to this
// method signature. The return value should be an empty string if the assertion
// passes and a well-formed failure message if not.
type assertion func(actual interface{}, expected ...interface{}) string

Each of the Should assertion functions in the assertions package can be used as an assertion func when calling So().

Here's a simple example of how to use So() with an assertion function in your code:

x, y := 99, 100
if ok, message := So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y); !ok {
    log.Println(message)
    // or log.Fatal(message) if you're feeling unforgiving...
}

Notice that this example makes no reference to the "testing" package's *testing.T, but it could:

x, y := 99, 100
if ok, message := So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y); !ok {
    t.Error(message)
}

If you know you're going to be using So within your test functions and calling t.Error() and the like, here's another way to use the assertions package:

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	x, y := 99, 100
	assertions.New(t).So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y)
}

Did you notice how we passed in t in the assertions.New() function? The nice thing about this approach is you don't actually have to call t.Error() in failure scenarios. That is handled by the Assertion.So() function because it is given a reference to t.

You can actually call .So() multiple times on an Assertion instance:

assert := assertions.New(t)
assert.So(1, ShouldBeGreaterThan, 2)
assert.So(true, ShouldBeFalse)
assert.So(time.Now(), ShouldHappenBefore, time.Now())
// etc...

You can find out if any of those assertions failed and act accordingly:

if assert.Failed() {
	log.Fatal("Ouch")
}

You've probably noticed that to be able to reference assertions.New and ShouldEqual you'll need an import statement like this:

import (
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
	. "github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
)

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	assert := assertions.New(t)
	assert.So(1, ShouldBeGreaterThan, 2)
	assert.So(true, ShouldBeFalse)
	assert.So(time.Now(), ShouldHappenBefore, time.Now())
}

That's somewhat awkward, so we created an alias package for the assertion functions called should:

import (
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions/should"
)

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	assert := assertions.New(t)
	assert.So(1, should.BeGreaterThan, 2)
	assert.So(true, should.BeFalse)
	assert.So(time.Now(), should.HappenBefore, time.Now())
}

Did you catch the difference? ShouldBeGreaterThan becomes should.BeGreaterThan. If you're using goimports, then this approach works out really smoothly. If you're not using goimports, why not? It's easy to set up.

The moral of the story is that it should be easy to check that a value is what you expect it to be. We prefer not to write if statements and hand-crafted log statements whenever possible, so we've created the assertions package that helps us in various contexts, both in testing and otherwise. In the next post, we'll talk about yet another use of the assertions package as we talk about our newest test library called gunit.

Before signing off, I would be remiss if I didn't give credit to Aaron Jacobs, the creator of the oglematchers package, which many of the assertion functions use internally to do their jobs.

Subscribe to our blog!
Learn more about RSS feeds here.
Read our recent posts
What to look for in an address data solution: Ease of implementation
Arrow Icon
You’ve maybe chosen an address data provider (or maybe you’ve just recently fallen out of love with the one you’ve got). Now comes the time to really test what matters: implementation. Even the best solution falls short if it’s hard to integrate, confusing to use, or impossible to maintain. This blog is part of our five-part series, What to look for in an address data solution. Previously, we discussed why human support teams should be top of mind when choosing an address data solution. Not just tech support, but educational materials, help getting started, and more.
What to look for in an address data solution: Quality of support
Arrow Icon
Selecting the right address data solution is only the beginning. Rolling it out successfully, resolving issues quickly, and keeping it performing at its best all depend on the quality of support behind it. This blog is part of our five-part series, What to look for in an address data solution. Previously, we discussed what it means to be accurate, what questions to ask any address data provider before entering into a contract with them, and how to avoid the accuracy “validation gap. ”Today, we’re focusing on an often-overlooked element: a supportive, accessible, and responsive partner.
What to look for in an address data solution: Data accuracy
Arrow Icon
Once you know what capabilities you need, the next challenge is choosing a provider that actually delivers—pun intended. This blog is part of our five-part series, What to look for in an address data solution. Previously, we discussed the need to find an address data solution that understands the importance of speed, scalability, and reliability, enabling you to maintain automated, efficient, and accurate workflows in any industry that deals with addresses. Today, we’ll focus on the hidden costs of inaccurate data, defining and combating the “validation gap”, and why it’s important in any industry.

Ready to get started?